The Supreme Court is a very, very big thing.
As of the end of March, the justices had been confirmed to a record 717 seats.
That’s more than the entire Republican caucus.
Just as importantly, the Supreme Court has played a central role in a number of key Supreme Court cases.
There were cases that paved the way for a variety of issues, including gay marriage, voting rights, and the Affordable Care Act.
But the court’s role has always been that of the arbiter of what is right and what is wrong.
The court has been asked to decide cases on a variety, sometimes conflicting, legal topics.
That includes the Affordable Health Care Act, abortion, campaign finance, voting, and, of course, campaign-finance laws.
A lot of the justices are very familiar with the concept of the role of the court in politics, and that has led to some pretty interesting outcomes.
The recent decisions that the court has ruled on have resulted in some pretty strange outcomes, including one involving whether the government can restrict the speech of individuals on the basis of their political views.
Here are five of the most interesting cases that have been decided in the last few years: Citizens United vs. FEC The Supreme in 2007 ruled that corporations and unions are allowed to contribute to political campaigns without disclosing the donors.
In 2016, the court struck down the ban.
The decision in Citizens United was hailed as a huge victory for free speech and democracy.
It created a huge gulf in the law between corporate entities and unions, and between the First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations.
The Citizens United decision came just a few years after the Supreme court ruled that an election official must disclose the names of donors to candidates and political parties.
In the same year, the Court struck down an Illinois law that would have required people who give more than $5,000 to political parties to disclose their identities.
In another landmark ruling, the United States Supreme Court overturned a Montana law that made it a crime to use a gun to prevent someone from committing a crime.
This case also sparked a huge debate about campaign finance laws.
In 2012, a Montana judge ruled that the state’s ban on corporate donations violated the First and 14th Amendments, because they were too broad and had the potential to create “corporate special interests.”
The justices struck down that ban.
Citizens United struck down a California law that restricted political contributions by corporations, unions, or labor unions.
The justices ruled that this restriction had the effect of burdening First Amendment speech.
This was a landmark ruling that opened the floodgates for the likes of the Koch brothers and other right-wing groups to spend unlimited amounts of money to support candidates who share their libertarian worldview.
In June, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the same-sex marriage ban is unconstitutional.
It was the court that said that marriage is not a union between a man and a woman.
The ruling paved the ground for gay marriage in the U